trmlabs.com Team | TRM Blog
TRM traced LastPass-linked Bitcoin laundering through mixers to high-risk Russian exchanges, showing how demixing exposes infrastructure reuse and limits mixer anonymity.
Key takeaways
In 2022, hackers breached LastPass, one of the world’s most widely used password managers, exposing backups of roughly 30 million customer vaults — encrypted containers holding users’ most sensitive digital credentials, including crypto private keys and seed phrases. * Although the vaults were encrypted and initially unreadable without each user’s master passwords, attackers were able to download them in bulk. That created a long-tail risk for more than 25 million users globally: any vault protected by a weak master password could eventually be decrypted offline, turning a single 2022 intrusion into a multi-year window for attackers to quietly crack passwords and drain assets over time.
New waves of wallet drains have surfaced throughout 2024 and 2025, extending the breach’s impact far beyond its initial disclosure. By analyzing a recent cluster of these drains, TRM analysts were able to trace the stolen funds through mixers and ultimately to two high-risk Russian exchanges frequently used by cybercriminals as fiat off-ramps — with one of them receiving LastPass-linked funds as recently as October.
These findings offer a clear on-chain view of how the stolen assets are being moved and monetized, helping illuminate the pathways and infrastructure supporting one of the most consequential credential breaches of the last decade. Based on the totality of on-chain evidence — including repeated interaction with Russia-associated infrastructure, continuity of control across pre-and post-mix activity, and the consistent use of high-risk Russian exchanges as off-ramps — TRM assesses that the activity is consistent with involvement by Russian cybercriminal actors.
Analysis of these thefts reveals two consistent indicators that point toward possible Russian cybercrime involvement.
First, stolen funds were repeatedly laundered through infrastructure commonly associated with Russian cybercriminal ecosystems, including off-ramps historically used by Russia-based threat actors.
Second, intelligence linked to the wallets interacting with mixers both before and after the mixing and laundering process indicated operational ties to Russia, suggesting continuity of control rather than downstream reuse by unrelated actors.
While definitive attribution of the original intrusion cannot yet be confirmed, these signals, combined with TRM’s ability to demix activity at scale, highlight both the central role of Russian cybercrime infrastructure in monetizing large-scale hacks and the diminishing effectiveness of mixing as a reliable means of obfuscation.
What demixing revealed
TRM identified a consistent on-chain signature across the thefts: stolen Bitcoin keys were imported into the same wallet software, producing shared transaction traits such as SegWit usage and Replace-by-Fee. Non-Bitcoin assets were quickly converted into Bitcoin via instant swap services, after which funds were transferred into single-use addresses and deposited into Wasabi Wallet. Using this pattern, TRM estimates that more than USD 28 million in cryptocurrency was stolen, converted to Bitcoin, and laundered through Wasabi in late 2024 and early 2025.
Rather than attempting to demix individual thefts in isolation, TRM analysts analyzed the activity as a coordinated campaign, identifying clusters of Wasabi deposits and withdrawals over time. Using proprietary demixing techniques, analysts matched the hackers’ deposits to a specific withdrawal cluster whose aggregate value and timing closely aligned with the inflows, an alignment statistically unlikely to be coincidental.
Blockchain fingerprints observed prior to mixing, combined with intelligence associated with wallets after the mixing process, consistently pointed to Russia-based operational control. The continuity across pre-mix and post-mix stages strengthens confidence that the laundering activity was conducted by actors operating within, or closely tied to, the Russian cybercrime ecosystem.
Early Wasabi withdrawals occurred within days of the initial wallet drains, suggesting that the attackers themselves were responsible for the initial CoinJoin activity. Taken together, these findings demonstrate both the diminishing reliability of mixing as an obfuscation technique and the central role of demixing in revealing the structure and geography of large-scale illicit campaigns.
Russian off-ramps as a reinforcing signal
Analysis of LastPass-linked laundering activity reveals two distinct phases that both converged on Russian exchanges. In an earlier phase following the initial exploitation, stolen funds were routed through the now defunct Cryptomixer.io and off-ramped via Cryptex, a Russia-based exchange sanctioned by OFAC in 2024. In a subsequent wave identified in September 2025, TRM analysts traced approximately USD 7 million in additional stolen funds through Wasabi Wallet, with withdrawals ultimately flowing to Audi6, another Russian exchange associated with cybercriminal activity.
Applying the same demixing methodology across both periods, TRM identified consistent laundering patterns, including clustered withdrawals and peeling chains that funneled mixed Bitcoin into these exchanges. The repeated use of Russian exchanges at the off-ramp stage, combined with intelligence indicating Russia-based operational control both before and after mixing, suggests continuity in the laundering infrastructure rather than isolated or opportunistic usage. Together, these findings point to alignment with a persistent Russian cybercriminal ecosystem across multiple phases of the LastPass-related activity.
Why the Russian connection matters
The significance of likely Russian involvement extends beyond this single case. Russian high-risk exchanges and laundering services have repeatedly served as critical off-ramps for globally dispersed ransomware groups, sanctions evaders, and other cybercriminal networks. Their role in the LastPass laundering pipeline underscores how Russia-based financial infrastructure continues to function as a systemic enabler of global cybercrime, even as enforcement pressure increases elsewhere.
This case also highlights how mixers do not eliminate attribution risk when threat actors rely on consistent infrastructure and geographic ecosystems over time. Demixing allowed TRM to move beyond individual transactions and reveal the broader operational architecture, including where illicit value ultimately converges.
Frequently asked questions (FAQs)
What happened in the LastPass breach?
In 2022, a threat actor gained access to encrypted vault data stored by LastPass. As users failed to rotate passwords or improve vault security, attackers continued to crack weak master passwords years later — leading to wallet drains as recently as late 2025.
Why is Russian involvement suspected?
TRM observed two consistent signals:
Pre and post-mix wallet intelligence pointed to the same operator using Russian infrastructure.
Off-ramps included multiple Russia-based exchanges, including one previously sanctioned for facilitating ransomware laundering.
Behavioral patterns (e.g. wallet software traits, transaction formatting)
Timing and amounts
Destination addresses with known ties to illicit ecosystems
This enabled linkage across waves of theft and over time — exposing centralized laundering control.
USD 28 million demixed from 2024–early 2025 flows
USD 7 million from a September 2025 wave linked to additional Wasabi usage
Why is this still happening three years later?
Many affected LastPass users failed to change or secure master passwords, and their vaults still contained private keys. As threat actors brute-force vaults over time, slow-drip wallet draining has become a recurring pattern.
What makes this case important?
This is a clear example of how:
Mixers don't provide true anonymity when infrastructure is reused
Off-ramp infrastructure remains the best attribution signal
Illicit networks adapt, but don’t disappear — when one service is sanctioned, another emerges
Government to roll out passkey technology across digital services as an alternative to SMS-based verification.
Government to roll out passkey technology across digital services as an alternative to SMS-based verification.
Arkadiusz Wargula via Getty Images
Government set to roll out passkey technology across digital services later this year.
SMS-based verification to be replaced by more secure, cost-effective solution.
NCSC joins FIDO Alliance to shape international passkey standards.
The UK government is set to roll out passkey technology for its digital services later this year as an alternative to the current SMS-based verification system, offering a more secure and cost-effective solution that could save several million pounds annually.
Announced on the first day of the government’s flagship cyber security event, CYBERUK, the move to implement passkey technology for the government’s GOV.UK services marks a major step forward in strengthening the nation’s digital security.
Passkeys are unique digital keys that are today tied to specific devices, such as a phone or a laptop, that help users log in safely without needing an additional text message or other code. When a user logs in to a website or app, their device uses this digital key to prove the user’s identity without needing to send a code to a secondary device or to receive user input.
This method is more secure because the key remains stored on the device and cannot be easily intercepted or stolen, making them phishing-resistant by design. As a result, even if someone attempts to steal a password or intercept a code, they would be unable to gain access without the physical device that contains the passkey.
The NCSC considers passkey adoption as vital for transforming cyber resilience at a national scale, and the UK is already leading internationally with the NHS becoming one of the first government organisations in the world to offer passkeys to users.
In addition to enhanced security and cost savings, passkeys offer users a faster login experience, saving approximately one minute per login when compared to entering a username, password, and SMS code.
Today it was discovered that an unknown actor had managed to exploit a vulnerability in Lockbit’s PHPMyAdmin instance (on their console onion site). Apparently they were running PHP 8.1.2 which is vulnerable to an RCE CVE-2024-4577. Which uhh… lol? It probably would have been prudent to do a post-paid penetration test on their own infrastructure at some point.
Further compounding the unfortunate situation, the actor was able to dump their database. This contained, as stated by Bleeping Computer, a number of tables such as bitcoin addresses, data about their build system such as bespoke builds for affiliates, A ‘chats’ table containing negotiation messages, which we’ll go through in a later post. And finally, of interest today, the usernames and passwords of LockBit agents using the console.
Of special importance, making our work markedly easier, these passwords were not hashed. Which sure is a choice, as an organization that performs ransomware attacks.
The vast majority of the passwords in this table as reasonably secure; it’s not solely hilariously weak credentials, but there still are a number that display poor security hygiene.
The weak passwords
Before going into my standard analysis, I’ll list off all of the weak passwords in question, and then we’ll go through the statistics of the whole set. The fun to highlight passwords:
Researchers say the behavior amounts to a persistent backdoor.
rom the department of head scratches comes this counterintuitive news: Microsoft says it has no plans to change a remote login protocol in Windows that allows people to log in to machines using passwords that have been revoked.
Password changes are among the first steps people should take in the event that a password has been leaked or an account has been compromised. People expect that once they've taken this step, none of the devices that relied on the password can be accessed.
The Remote Desktop Protocol—the proprietary mechanism built into Windows for allowing a remote user to log in to and control a machine as if they were directly in front of it—however, will in many cases continue trusting a password even after a user has changed it. Microsoft says the behavior is a design decision to ensure users never get locked out.
Independent security researcher Daniel Wade reported the behavior earlier this month to the Microsoft Security Response Center. In the report, he provided step-by-step instructions for reproducing the behavior. He went on to warn that the design defies nearly universal expectations that once a password has been changed, it can no longer give access to any devices or accounts associated with it.
In iOS 18, Apple spun off its Keychain password management tool—previously only tucked away in Settings—into a standalone app called...
The largest password compilation with nearly ten billion unique passwords was leaked on a popular hacking forum. The Cybernews research team believes the leak poses severe dangers to users prone to reusing passwords.
The king is dead. Long live the king. Cybernews researchers discovered what appears to be the largest password compilation with a staggering 9,948,575,739 unique plaintext passwords. The file with the data, titled rockyou2024.txt, was posted on July 4th by forum user ObamaCare.
Today we loaded 16.5M email addresses and 13.5M unique passwords provided by law enforcement agencies into Have I Been Pwned (HIBP) following botnet takedowns in a campaign they've coined Operation Endgame. That link provides an excellent overview so start there then come back to this blog post which
Microsoft has resolved a security lapse that exposed internal company files and credentials to the open internet.
Security researchers Can Yoleri, Murat Özfidan and Egemen Koçhisarlı with SOCRadar, a cybersecurity company that helps organizations find security weaknesses, discovered an open and public storage server hosted on Microsoft’s Azure cloud service that was storing internal information relating to Microsoft’s Bing search engine.
The Azure storage server housed code, scripts and configuration files containing passwords, keys and credentials used by the Microsoft employees for accessing other internal databases and systems.
Comparing the password strength of 5 hacking forum users that were compromised with info-stealers - Hackforums.net,...