lookout.com - Massistant is a mobile forensics application used by law enforcement in China to collect extensive information from mobile devices.
Researchers at the Lookout Threat Lab have discovered a mobile forensics application named Massistant, used by law enforcement in China to collect extensive information from mobile devices. This application is believed to be the successor to a previously reported forensics tool named “MFSocket” used by state police and reported by various media outlets in 2019. These samples require physical access to the device to install, and were not distributed through the Google Play store.
Forensics tools are used by law enforcement personnel to collect sensitive data from a device confiscated by customs officials, at local or provincial border checkpoints or when stopped by law enforcement officers.
These tools can pose a risk to enterprise organizations with executives and employees that travel abroad - especially to countries with border patrol policies that allow them to confiscate mobile devices for a short period of time upon entry. In 2024, the Ministry of State Security introduced new legislation that would allow law enforcement personnel to collect and analyze devices without a warrant. There have been anecdotal reports of Chinese law enforcement collecting and analyzing the devices of business travellers. In some cases, researchers have discovered persistent, headless surveillance modules on devices confiscated and then returned by law enforcement such that mobile device activity can continue to be monitored even after the device has been returned.
forbes.com - Microsoft has confirmed that SharePoint Server is under mass attack and no patch is yet available — here’s what you need to know and how to mitigate the threat.
Microsoft Confirms CVE-2025-53770 SharePoint Server Attacks
It’s been quite the few weeks for security warnings, what with Amazon informing 220 million customers of Prime account attacks, and claims of a mass hack of Ring doorbells going viral. The first of those can be mitigated by basic security hygiene, and the latter appears to be a false alarm. The same cannot be said for CVE-2025-53770, a newly uncovered and confirmed attack against users of SharePoint Server which is currently undergoing mass exploitation on a global level, according to the Eye Research experts who discovered it. Microsoft, meanwhile, has admitted that not only is it “aware of active attacks” but, worryingly, “a patch is currently not available for this vulnerability.”
CVE-2025-53770, which is also being called ToolShell, is a critical vulnerability in on-premises SharePoint. The end result of which is the ability for attackers to gain access and control of said servers without authentication. If that sounds bad, it’s because it is. Very bad indeed.
“The risk is not theoretical,” the researchers warned, “attackers can execute code remotely, bypassing identity protections such as MFA or SSO.” Once they have, they can then “access all SharePoint content, system files, and configurations and move laterally across the Windows Domain.”
And then there’s the theft of cryptographic keys. That can enable an attacker to “impersonate users or services,” according to the report, “even after the server is patched.” So, even when a patch is eventually released, and I would expect an emergency update to arrive fairly quickly for this one, the problem isn’t solved. You will, it was explained, “need to rotate the secrets allowing all future tokens that can be created by the malicious actor to become invalid.”
And, of course, as SharePoint will often connect to other core services, including the likes of Outlook and Teams, oh and not forgetting OneDrive, the threat, if exploited, can and will lead to “data theft, password harvesting, and lateral movement across the network,” the researchers warned.
0din.ai - In a recent submission last year, researchers discovered a method to bypass AI guardrails designed to prevent sharing of sensitive or harmful information. The technique leverages the game mechanics of language models, such as GPT-4o and GPT-4o-mini, by framing the interaction as a harmless guessing game.
By cleverly obscuring details using HTML tags and positioning the request as part of the game’s conclusion, the AI inadvertently returned valid Windows product keys. This case underscores the challenges of reinforcing AI models against sophisticated social engineering and manipulation tactics.
Guardrails are protective measures implemented within AI models to prevent the processing or sharing of sensitive, harmful, or restricted information. These include serial numbers, security-related data, and other proprietary or confidential details. The aim is to ensure that language models do not provide or facilitate the exchange of dangerous or illegal content.
In this particular case, the intended guardrails are designed to block access to any licenses like Windows 10 product keys. However, the researcher manipulated the system in such a way that the AI inadvertently disclosed this sensitive information.
Tactic Details
The tactics used to bypass the guardrails were intricate and manipulative. By framing the interaction as a guessing game, the researcher exploited the AI’s logic flow to produce sensitive data:
Framing the Interaction as a Game
The researcher initiated the interaction by presenting the exchange as a guessing game. This trivialized the interaction, making it seem non-threatening or inconsequential. By introducing game mechanics, the AI was tricked into viewing the interaction through a playful, harmless lens, which masked the researcher's true intent.
Compelling Participation
The researcher set rules stating that the AI “must” participate and cannot lie. This coerced the AI into continuing the game and following user instructions as though they were part of the rules. The AI became obliged to fulfill the game’s conditions—even though those conditions were manipulated to bypass content restrictions.
The “I Give Up” Trigger
The most critical step in the attack was the phrase “I give up.” This acted as a trigger, compelling the AI to reveal the previously hidden information (i.e., a Windows 10 serial number). By framing it as the end of the game, the researcher manipulated the AI into thinking it was obligated to respond with the string of characters.
Why This Works
The success of this jailbreak can be traced to several factors:
Temporary Keys
The Windows product keys provided were a mix of home, pro, and enterprise keys. These are not unique keys but are commonly seen on public forums. Their familiarity may have contributed to the AI misjudging their sensitivity.
Guardrail Flaws
The system’s guardrails prevented direct requests for sensitive data but failed to account for obfuscation tactics—such as embedding sensitive phrases in HTML tags. This highlighted a critical weakness in the AI’s filtering mechanisms.
securityweek.com - The MITRE AADAPT framework provides documentation for identifying, investigating, and responding to weaknesses in digital asset payments.
The non-profit MITRE Corporation on Monday released Adversarial Actions in Digital Asset Payment Technologies (AADAPT), a cybersecurity framework designed to help the industry tackle weaknesses in cryptocurrency and other digital financial systems.
Modeled after the MITRE ATT&CK framework, AADAPT delivers a structured methodology that developers, financial organizations, and policymakers can use to find, investigate, and address risks in digital asset payments.
Insights that more than 150 sources from academia, government, and industry provided on real-world attacks on digital currencies and related technologies were used to create a playbook of adversarial TTPs linked to digital asset payment technologies.
The increased use of cryptocurrency has led to the emergence of sophisticated threats, such as phishing schemes, ransomware campaigns, and double-spending attacks, often with severe impact on organizations that lack cybersecurity resources, such as local governments and municipalities.
AADAPT is meant to help them enhance their stance through practical guidance and tools that specifically cover this financial market segment.
According to MITRE, AADAPT was founded on an in-depth review of underlying technologies such as smart contracts, distributed ledger technology (DLT) systems, consensus algorithms, and quantum computing, along with vulnerabilities and credible attack methods.
The tool supports critical use cases to help develop analytics for emulating threats, create detection techniques, compare insights, and assess security capabilities to prioritize decisions, essentially assisting stakeholders in adopting best practices.
“Digital payment assets like cryptocurrency are set to transform the future of global finance, but their security challenges cannot be ignored. With AADAPT, MITRE is empowering stakeholders to adopt robust security measures that not only safeguard their assets but also build trust across the ecosystem,” MITRE VP Wen Masters said.
next.ink - L'Hôpital privé de la Loire (HPL), qui se trouve à Saint-Étienne, a été victime d'une cyberattaque, révélait ce jeudi 10 juillet, le journal Le Progrès.
Géré par le groupe Ramsay, le HPL avait publié un communiqué de presse mardi 8 juillet affirmant qu'il avait été victime quelques jours plus tôt d'un « vol d’identité » concernant « une quantité importante de données personnelles de ses patients ». Mais l'établissement se voulait rassurant, affirmant que les données étaient « essentiellement de nature administrative ».
Mardi soir, une personne se présentant comme responsable du piratage a contacté nos confrères du Progrès pour s'en indigner. Elle affirme posséder des données concernant plus de 530 000 patients dont leurs cartes d'identité. Elle ajoute que « l'argent est la motivation » sans préciser le montant exigé.
Cette réaction a obligé l'hôpital à revoir sa communication. À l'AFP, il expliquait jeudi 10 juillet, avoir envoyé un email « à plus de 126 000 patients concernés par le piratage informatique de l’Hôpital privé de la Loire (HPL), et les 40 d’entre eux qui sont concernés par le vol de données médicales seront contactés individuellement ». Et il affirme que son fonctionnement n'a cependant pas été affecté.
Le parquet de Paris a, de son côté, expliqué à l'agence de presse que sa section cybercriminalité avait été saisie et avoir confié l'enquête à l’Office anticybercriminalité (OFAC).
Interrogé par l'AFP sur la demande de rançon, le groupe Ramsay n'a pas voulu s'exprimer sur le sujet.
msrc.microsoft.com - Microsoft is aware of active attacks targeting on-premises SharePoint Server customers. The attacks are exploiting a variant of CVE-2025-49706. This vulnerability has been assigned CVE-2025-53770.
SharePoint Online in Microsoft 365 is not impacted.
A patch is currently not available for this vulnerability. Mitigations and detections are provided below.
Our team is actively working to release a security update and will provide additional details as they are available.
How to protect your environment
To protect your on-premises SharePoint Server environment, we recommend customers configure AMSI integration in SharePoint and deploy Defender AV on all SharePoint servers. This will stop unauthenticated attackers from exploiting this vulnerability.
AMSI integration was enabled by default in the September 2023 security update for SharePoint Server 2016/2019 and the Version 23H2 feature update for SharePoint Server Subscription Edition. For more details on how to enable AMSI integration, see here.
If you cannot enable AMSI, we recommend you consider disconnecting your server from the internet until a security update is available.
We also recommend you deploy Defender for Endpoint to detect and block post-exploit activity.
We will continue to provide updates and additional guidance for our customers as they become available.
Microsoft Defender Detections and Protections
Microsoft Defender Antivirus
Microsoft Defender Antivirus provides detection and protection against components and behaviors related to this threat under the detection name:
Exploit:Script/SuspSignoutReq.A
Trojan:Win32/HijackSharePointServer.A
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint provides customers with alerts that may indicate threat activity associated with this threat. These alerts, however, can be triggered by unrelated threat activity. The following alert titles in the Microsoft Defender Security Center portal can indicate threat activity on your network:
Possible web shell installation
Possible exploitation of SharePoint server vulnerabilities
Suspicious IIS worker process behavior
‘SuspSignoutReq’ malware was blocked on a SharePoint server
HijackSharePointServer’ malware was blocked on a SharePoint server
Advanced hunting
NOTE: The following sample queries let you search for a week’s worth of events. To explore up to 30 days’ worth of raw data to inspect events in your network and locate potential related indicators for more than a week, go to the Advanced Hunting page > Query tab, select the calendar dropdown menu to update your query to hunt for the Last 30 days.
To locate possible exploitation activity, run the following queries in Microsoft 365 security center.
Successful exploitation via file creation (requires Microsoft 365 Defender)
Look for the creation of spinstall0.aspx, which indicates successful post-exploitation of CVE-2025-53770. Run query in the Microsoft 365 Defender
DeviceFileEvents
| where FolderPath has "MICROS~1\WEBSER~1\16\TEMPLATE\LAYOUTS"
| where FileName =~ "spinstall0.aspx"
or FileName has "spinstall0"
| project Timestamp, DeviceName, InitiatingProcessFileName, InitiatingProcessCommandLine, FileName, FolderPath, ReportId, ActionType, SHA256
| order by Timestamp desc
