Lors de sa séance du 14 mai 2025, le Conseil fédéral a été informé du contenu du premier rapport sur la mise en œuvre de la Cyberstratégie nationale (CSN), lequel documente l’état des travaux menés au niveau national pour renforcer la cybersécurité. Rédigé par le comité de pilotage de la CSN en collaboration avec l’Office fédéral de la cybersécurité (OFCS), il montre des progrès évidents : la création d’importantes structures de coordination, l’avancée de projets en cours et le lancement de nouveaux projets, sans compter le renforcement de la visibilité internationale de la Suisse dans le domaine de la cybersécurité.
Avec la CSN, la Confédération poursuit une approche globale visant à renforcer la cyberrésilience de la Suisse. Cinq objectifs stratégiques sont au cœur de cette démarche : la responsabilisation de la population, la sécurité des prestations numériques et des infrastructures critiques, la gestion et la défense contre les cyberattaques, la lutte contre la cybercriminalité, et la coopération internationale. Le rapport sur la mise en œuvre de la CSN montre des progrès évidents : la poursuite ciblée de projets en cours et le lancement de nouveaux projets dans les cinq objectifs stratégiques de la CSN.
Progrès concrets
Des mesures de sensibilisation et de promotion de la recherche et de la formation sont venues renforcer les compétences de la population, des entreprises et des autorités dans le traitement des cybermenaces. La campagne « S-U-P-E-R.ch » menée en 2024 et la participation de la Suisse au « European Cyber Security Month » ont contribué à sensibiliser le grand public aux thèmes liés à la cybersécurité.
La stratégie continue d’être axée sur la protection des infrastructures critiques face aux cybermenaces. La mise en œuvre des programmes de gestion des vulnérabilités, p. ex. le programme de primes aux bogues de la Confédération, et la construction de centres spécialisés en cybersécurité (CSC) dans des secteurs sensibles comme ceux de la santé et du trafic ferroviaire ont permis de réaliser des progrès notables. La création du Cyber Security Hubs (CSH) à l’OFCS a par ailleurs favorisé le développement des échanges d’information concernant les cybermenaces.
En matière de normalisation et de réglementation, les travaux visant à introduire une obligation d’annoncer les cyberattaques contre des infrastructures critiques ont été au premier plan l’année dernière. Cette obligation est entrée en vigueur le 1er avril 2025. Il s’agit de la première réglementation multisectorielle dans le domaine de la cybersécurité.
Dans le domaine de la lutte contre la cybercriminalité, la CSN favorise le développement de capacités spécialisées au sein des autorités de poursuites pénales et le renforcement de la coopération tant au niveau national qu’international. Des plateformes telles que Cyber-CASE et NEDIK permettent une détection et un traitement plus rapides des infractions numériques. Parallèlement, la standardisation des données et des processus ainsi que des formations et perfectionnements ciblés devrait permettre de gagner encore en efficience dans ce domaine à l’avenir.
Au niveau international, la Suisse s’est positionnée activement en faveur de la sécurité dans l’espace numérique. Avec des initiatives comme la Geneva Cyber Week, elle promeut la place internationale de Genève et renforce, en participant au processus de l’ONU et à la Counter Ransomware Initiative, les efforts internationaux visant à établir des règles contraignantes dans le cyberespace.
Computer scientists at ETH Zurich discover new class of vulnerabilities in Intel processors, allowing them to break down barriers between different users of a processor using carefully crafted instruction sequences. Entire processor memory can be read by employing quick, repeated attacks.
All Intel processors since 2018 are affected by Branch Privilege Injection.
In brief
Google Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG) has identified a new piece of malware called LOSTKEYS, attributed to the Russian government-backed threat group COLDRIVER (also known as UNC4057, Star Blizzard, and Callisto). LOSTKEYS is capable of stealing files from a hard-coded list of extensions and directories, along with sending system information and running processes to the attacker. Observed in January, March, and April 2025, LOSTKEYS marks a new development in the toolset of COLDRIVER, a group primarily known for credential phishing against high-profile targets like NATO governments, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and former intelligence and diplomatic officers. GTIG has been tracking COLDRIVER for many years, including their SPICA malware in 2024.
COLDRIVER typically targets high-profile individuals at their personal email addresses or at NGO addresses. They are known for stealing credentials and after gaining access to a target’s account they exfiltrate emails and steal contact lists from the compromised account. In select cases, COLDRIVER also delivers malware to target devices and may attempt to access files on the system.
Recent targets in COLDRIVER’s campaigns have included current and former advisors to Western governments and militaries, as well as journalists, think tanks, and NGOs. The group has also continued targeting individuals connected to Ukraine. We believe the primary goal of COLDRIVER’s operations is intelligence collection in support of Russia’s strategic interests. In a small number of cases, the group has been linked to hack-and-leak campaigns targeting officials in the UK and an NGO.
To safeguard at-risk users, we use our research on serious threat actors like COLDRIVER to improve the safety and security of Google’s products. We encourage potential targets to enroll in Google's Advanced Protection Program, enable Enhanced Safe Browsing for Chrome, and ensure that all devices are updated.
UNC3944, which overlaps with public reporting on Scattered Spider, is a financially-motivated threat actor characterized by its persistent use of social engineering and brazen communications with victims. In early operations, UNC3944 largely targeted telecommunications-related organizations to support SIM swap operations. However, after shifting to ransomware and data theft extortion in early 2023, they impacted organizations in a broader range of industries. Since then, we have regularly observed UNC3944 conduct waves of targeting against a specific sector, such as financial services organizations in late 2023 and food services in May 2024. Notably, UNC3944 has also previously targeted prominent brands, possibly in an attempt to gain prestige and increased attention by news media.
Google Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG) observed a decline in UNC3944 activity after 2024 law enforcement actions against individuals allegedly associated with the group. Threat actors will often temporarily halt or significantly curtail operations after an arrest, possibly to reduce law enforcement attention, rebuild capabilities and/or partnerships, or shift to new tooling to evade detection. UNC3944’s existing ties to a broader community of threat actors could potentially help them recover from law enforcement actions more quickly.
Recent public reporting has suggested that threat actors used tactics consistent with Scattered Spider to target a UK retail organization and deploy DragonForce ransomware. Subsequent reporting by BBC News indicates that actors associated with DragonForce claimed responsibility for attempted attacks at multiple UK retailers. Notably, the operators of DragonForce ransomware recently claimed control of RansomHub, a ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) that seemingly ceased operations in March of this year. UNC3944 was a RansomHub affiliate in 2024, after the ALPHV (aka Blackcat) RaaS shut down. While GTIG has not independently confirmed the involvement of UNC3944 or the DragonForce RaaS, over the past few years, retail organizations have been increasingly posted on tracked data leak sites (DLS) used by extortion actors to pressure victims and/or leak stolen victim data. Retail organizations accounted for 11 percent of DLS victims in 2025 thus far, up from about 8.5 percent in 2024 and 6 percent in 2022 and 2023. It is plausible that threat actors including UNC3944 view retail organizations as attractive targets, given that they typically possess large quantities of personally identifiable information (PII) and financial data. Further, these companies may be more likely to pay a ransom demand if a ransomware attack impacts their ability to process financial transactions.
Apple rolls out iOS and macOS platform updates to fix serious security bugs that could be triggered simply by opening an image or video file.
Apple on Monday pushed out patches for security vulnerabilities across the macOS, iPhone and iPad software stack, warning that code-execution bugs that could be triggered simply by opening a rigged image, video or website.
The new iOS 18.5 update, rolled out alongside patches for iPadOS, covers critical bugs in AppleJPEG and CoreMedia with a major warning from Cupertino that attackers could craft malicious media files to run arbitrary code with the privileges of the targeted app.
The company also documented serious file-parsing vulnerabilities patched in CoreAudio, CoreGraphics, and ImageIO, each capable of crashing apps or leaking data if booby-trapped content is opened.
The iOS 18.5 update also provides cover for at least 9 documented WebKit flaws, some serious enough to lead to exploits that allow a hostile website to execute code or crash the Safari browser engine.
The company also patched a serious ‘mute-button’ flaw in FaceTime that exposes the audio conversation even after muting the microphone.
Beneath the interface, Apple said iOS 18.5 hardens the kernel against two memory-corruption issues and cleans up a libexpat flaw (CVE-2024-8176) that affects a broad range of software projects.
Other notable fixes include an issue in Baseband (CVE-2025-31214) that allows attackers in a privileged network position to intercept traffic on the new iPhone 16e line; a privilege escalation bug in mDNSResponder (CVE-2025-31222); an issue in Notes that expose data from a locked iPhone screen; and security gaps in FrontBoard, iCloud Document Sharing, and Mail Addressing.
Marks & Spencer hackers appear to protect ‘former Soviet states’ from attacks
Marks & Spencer hackers appear to protect ‘former Soviet states’ from attacks
DragonForce group also says it has targeted Co-op and Harrods in cybercrime spree
Hackers who bragged about crippling Marks & Spencer’s systems and breaching Co-op Group databases appeared to have vowed to protect “the former Soviet Union” from the technology used in the attacks.
The DragonForce cybercrime group appeared to use a dark web forum to issue a threat to “punish any violations” by fellow hackers planning to use its ransomware in Russia or the former Soviet states – the first indication of any allegiance.
The group, which licenses its ransomware to other hacking gangs for a fee, claimed responsibility for an attack that has left shelves at some branches of M&S bare and has forced the company to suspend online orders.
A separate attack on the Co-op led to a data breach and customer details being stolen, and the group has also been linked to an attempt to hack systems at Harrods.
“Any attack by our software on critical infrastructure, hospitals where critical patients, children, and the elderly are kept, or on the countries of the former Soviet Union, is a PROVOCATION by unscrupulous partners,” read a statement which claimed to be from the group, released at the end of last month.
“We, as regulators, are doing our best to counteract this, and we will punish any violations, as well as assist in solving the problems of the affected parties.”
It's time to update your Macs again! This time, I'm not burying the lede. CVE-2025-31250, which was patched in today's release of macOS Sequoia 15.5, allowed for…
…any Application A to make macOS show a permission consent prompt…
…appearing as if it were coming from any Application B…
…with the results of the user's consent response being applied to any Application C.
These did not have to be different applications. In fact, in most normal uses, they would all likely be the same application. Even a case where Applications B and C were the same but different than Application A would be relatively safe (if somewhat useless from Application A's perspective). However, prior to this vulnerability being patched, a lack of validation allowed for Application B (the app the prompt appears to be from) to be different than Application C (the actual application the user's consent response is applied to).
Spoofing these kinds of prompts is not exactly new. In fact, the HackTricks wiki has had a tutorial on how to perform a similar trick on their site for a while. However, their method requires:
the building of an entire fake app in a temporary directory,
the overriding of a shortcut on the Dock, and
the simple hoping that the user clicks on the (now) fake shortcut.
This vulnerability requires none of the above.
TCC
As I explained in my first ever article on this site, TCC is the core permissions system built into Apple's operating systems. It is used by sending messages to the tccd daemon (or rather, by using functions in the private TCC framework). The framework is a private API, so developers don't call the functions directly (instead, public API's call the functions under-the-hood as needed). However, all this wrapping cannot hide the fact that the control mechanism is still simply sending messages to the daemon.
The daemon uses Apple's public (but proprietary) XPC API for messaging (specifically the lower-level dictionary-based API). Prior to this vulnerability being patched, any app with the ability to send XPC messages to tccd could send it a specifically-crafted message that, as described above, would make it display a permission prompt as if it were from one app but then apply the user's response to a completely separate app. But how was this possible, and was it even hard? Before I answer these questions, we need to detour into what will, at first, seem like a completely unrelated topic.
U.K. retail giant Marks & Spencer has confirmed hackers stole its customers’ personal information during a cyberattack last month.
In a brief statement with London’s stock exchange on Tuesday, the retailer said an unspecified amount of customer information was taken in the data breach. The BBC, which first reported the company’s filing, cited a Marks & Spencer online letter as saying that the stolen data includes customer names, dates of birth, home and email addresses, phone numbers, household information and online order histories.
The company also said it was resetting the online account passwords of its customers.
Marks & Spencer continues to experience disruption and outages across its stores, with some grocery shelves remaining empty after the hack affected the company’s operations. The company’s online ordering system for customers also remains offline.
It’s not clear how many individuals’ data was stolen during the hack. When reached by TechCrunch, Marks & Spencer spokesperson Alicia Sanctuary would not say how many individuals are affected and referred TechCrunch to its online statement. Marks & Spencer had 9.4 million online customers as of 30 March 2024, per its most recent annual report.
Dior’s coveted client list of China’s wealthiest and most powerful consumers has been compromised in a major data breach, forcing the French luxury giant to issue an apology as it scrambles to contain potential fallout and limit any damage to its reputation.
The luxury brand under French conglomerate LVMH experienced a customer data breach in China on May 7. According to a text message sent to customers yesterday, the company disclosed that an unauthorized external party had gained access to its database, obtaining sensitive personal information such as customers’ names, gender, phone numbers, email addresses, mailing addresses, purchase amounts, and shopping preferences.
Dior emphasized that the compromised data did not include bank account details, IBANs (International Bank Account Numbers), or credit card information. Nonetheless, the brand urged customers to exercise heightened caution, advising them to beware of phishing messages, unsolicited calls or emails, and to avoid clicking on suspicious links or disclosing personal information.
Screen is the traditional terminal multiplexer software used on Linux and Unix systems. We found a local root exploit in Screen 5.0.0 affecting Arch Linux and NetBSD, as well as a couple of other issues that partly also affect older Screen versions, which are still found in the majority of distributions.
In July 2024, the upstream Screen maintainer asked us if we could have a look at the current Screen code base. We treated this request with lower priority, since we already had a cursory look at Screen a few years earlier, without finding any problems. When we actually found time to look into it again, we were surprised to find a local root exploit in the Screen 5.0.0 major version update affecting distributions that ship it as setuid-root (Arch Linux and NetBSD). We also found a number of additional, less severe issues that partly also affect older Screen versions still found in the majority of distributions.
We offer two sets of patches for the issues described in this report, one for screen-4.9.1 and another for screen-5.0.0. These patch sets apply against the screen-4.9.1 and screen-5.0.0 release tarballs, respectively. Due to difficulties in the communication with upstream we do not currently have detailed information about bugfixes and releases published on their end.
The next section provides an overview of the Screen configurations and versions found on common Linux and UNIX distributions. Section 3) discusses each security issue we discovered in detail. Section 4) takes a look at possible further issues in Screen’s setuid-root implementation. Section 5) gives general recommendations for the improvement of Screen’s security posture. Section 6) points out problems we encountered during the coordinated disclosure process for these issues. Section 7) provides an affectedness matrix which gives a quick overview of the situation on various Linux and UNIX systems.
A new campaign employing ClickFix attacks has been spotted targeting both Windows and Linux systems using instructions that make infections on either operating system possible.
A new campaign employing ClickFix attacks has been spotted targeting both Windows and Linux systems using instructions that make infections on either operating system possible.
ClickFix is a social engineering tactic where fake verification systems or application errors are used to trick website visitors into running console commands that install malware.
These attacks have traditionally targeted Windows systems, prompting targets to execute PowerShell scripts from the Windows Run command, resulting in info-stealer malware infections and even ransomware.
However, a 2024 campaign using bogus Google Meet errors also targeted macOS users.
ClickFix targeting Linux users
A more recent campaign spotted by Hunt.io researchers last week is among the first to adapt this social engineering technique for Linux systems.
The attack, which is attributed to the Pakistan-linked threat group APT36 (aka "Transparent Tribe"), utilizes a website that impersonates India's Ministry of Defence with a link to an allegedly official press release.
On April 24, 2025, SAP disclosed CVE-2025-31324, a critical vulnerability with a CVSS score of 10.0 affecting the SAP NetWeaver's Visual Composer Framework, version 7.50.
CVE-2025-31324 is a critical vulnerability residing in the SAP NetWeaver Application Server Java's Visual Composer component (VCFRAMEWORK). While not installed by default, business analysts commonly use this component to create applications without coding, making it widely present in SAP deployments.
The core issue with this vulnerability is a missing authorization check in the Metadata Uploader, accessible via the /developmentserver/metadatauploader endpoint. This means that any user, even unauthenticated ones, can interact with this endpoint and upload arbitrary files to the server.
Here's a breakdown of how the vulnerability works:
Unrestricted access: The /developmentserver/metadatauploader endpoint is exposed over HTTP/HTTPS and lacks proper authentication or authorization controls.
Malicious file upload: An attacker can send a specially crafted HTTP request to the vulnerable endpoint, containing a malicious file as the request body.
File system access: Due to the missing authorization check, the server accepts the attacker's request and writes the uploaded file to the server's file system. The file is often written to a location within the web application's accessible directories (e.g., under /irj/servlet_jsp/irj/root/).
Web shell execution (common scenario): If the attacker uploads a web shell like a Java server page (JSP) file, the attacker can then access the web shell via a web browser. Now residing on the server, this web shell allows an attacker to execute arbitrary operating system commands with the privileges of the SAP application server process.
System compromise: With the ability to execute commands as an SAP system administrator (system account name: sidadm), an attacker effectively gains control of the SAP system and its associated data. The attacker can then perform various malicious activities.
CVE-2025-31324 allows attackers to bypass security controls and directly upload and execute malicious files on vulnerable SAP servers, potentially leading to complete system compromise. The ease of exploitation (no authentication required) and the possibility for high impact make this a critical vulnerability that requires immediate attention and remediation.
L'Ateneo: la nostra infrastruttura è stata oggetto di un grave attacco informatico che ha reso inaccessibili i siti web
Attacco hacker a Roma Tre, siti dell'università inaccessibili. Lo rende noto la stessa Università, spiegando che «nella notte dell’8 maggio, si è registrata una interruzione dei servizi informatici di Ateneo. A seguito delle operazioni di verifica effettuate già nella notte e proseguite per tutta la mattina del 9 si è potuto constatare che l'infrastruttura dell'Ateneo è stata oggetto di un grave attacco informatico che ha reso inaccessibili i siti web di Ateneo».
CVE-2025-37752 is an Array-Out-Of-Bounds vulnerability in the Linux network packet scheduler, specifically in the SFQ queuing discipline. An invalid SFQ limit and a series of interactions between SFQ and the TBF Qdisc can lead to a 0x0000 being written approximately 256KB out of bounds at a misaligned offset. If properly exploited, this can enable privilege escalation.
RATatouille: A Malicious Recipe Hidden in rand-user-agent (Supply Chain Compromise)
On 5 May, 16:00 GMT+0, our automated malware analysis pipeline detected a suspicious package released, rand-user-agent@1.0.110. It detected unusual code in the package, and it wasn’t wrong. It detected signs of a supply chain attack against this legitimate package, which has about ~45.000 weekly downloads.
What is the package?
The package rand-user-agent generates randomized real user-agent strings based on their frequency of occurrence. It’s maintained by the company WebScrapingAPI (https://www.webscrapingapi.com/).
Our analysis engine detected suspicious code in the file dist/index.js. Lets check it out, here seen through the code view on npm’s site:
We’ve got a RAT (Remote Access Trojan) on our hands. Here’s an overview of it:
Behavior Overview
The script sets up a covert communication channel with a command-and-control (C2) server using socket.io-client, while exfiltrating files via axios to a second HTTP endpoint. It dynamically installs these modules if missing, hiding them in a custom .node_modules folder under the user's home directory.
Government to roll out passkey technology across digital services as an alternative to SMS-based verification.
Government to roll out passkey technology across digital services as an alternative to SMS-based verification.
Arkadiusz Wargula via Getty Images
Government set to roll out passkey technology across digital services later this year.
SMS-based verification to be replaced by more secure, cost-effective solution.
NCSC joins FIDO Alliance to shape international passkey standards.
The UK government is set to roll out passkey technology for its digital services later this year as an alternative to the current SMS-based verification system, offering a more secure and cost-effective solution that could save several million pounds annually.
Announced on the first day of the government’s flagship cyber security event, CYBERUK, the move to implement passkey technology for the government’s GOV.UK services marks a major step forward in strengthening the nation’s digital security.
Passkeys are unique digital keys that are today tied to specific devices, such as a phone or a laptop, that help users log in safely without needing an additional text message or other code. When a user logs in to a website or app, their device uses this digital key to prove the user’s identity without needing to send a code to a secondary device or to receive user input.
This method is more secure because the key remains stored on the device and cannot be easily intercepted or stolen, making them phishing-resistant by design. As a result, even if someone attempts to steal a password or intercept a code, they would be unable to gain access without the physical device that contains the passkey.
The NCSC considers passkey adoption as vital for transforming cyber resilience at a national scale, and the UK is already leading internationally with the NHS becoming one of the first government organisations in the world to offer passkeys to users.
In addition to enhanced security and cost savings, passkeys offer users a faster login experience, saving approximately one minute per login when compared to entering a username, password, and SMS code.
A vulnerability in the Out-of-Band Access Point (AP) Image Download feature of Cisco IOS XE Software for Wireless LAN Controllers (WLCs) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to upload arbitrary files to an affected system.
This vulnerability is due to the presence of a hard-coded JSON Web Token (JWT) on an affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted HTTPS requests to the AP image download interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to upload files, perform path traversal, and execute arbitrary commands with root privileges.
Note: For exploitation to be successful, the Out-of-Band AP Image Download feature must be enabled on the device. It is not enabled by default.
Cisco has released software updates that address this vulnerability. There are no workarounds that address this vulnerability.
This advisory is available at the following link:
https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-wlc-file-uplpd-rHZG9UfC
This advisory is part of the May 2025 release of the Cisco IOS and IOS XE Software Security Advisory Bundled Publication. For a complete list of the advisories and links to them, see Cisco Event Response: May 2025 Semiannual Cisco IOS and IOS XE Software Security Advisory Bundled Publication.
RSAC: Can we turn to govt, academic models instead?
Corporate AI models are already skewed to serve their makers' interests, and unless governments and academia step up to build transparent alternatives, the tech risks becoming just another tool for commercial manipulation.
That's according to cryptography and privacy guru Bruce Schneier, who spoke to The Register last week following a keynote speech at the RSA Conference in San Francisco.
"I worry that it'll be like search engines, which you use as if they are neutral third parties but are actually trying to manipulate you. They try to kind of get you to visit the websites of the advertisers," he told us. "It's integrity that we really need to think about, integrity as a security property and how it works with AI."
During his RSA keynote, Schneier asked: "Did your chatbot recommend a particular airline or hotel because it's the best deal for you, or because the AI company got a kickback from those companies?"
To deal with this quandary, Schneier proposes that governments should start taking a more hands-on stance in regulating AI, forcing model developers to be more open about the information they receive, and how the decisions models make are conceived.
He praised the EU AI Act, noting that it provides a mechanism to adapt the law as technology evolves, though he acknowledged there are teething problems. The legislation, which entered into force in August 2024, introduces phased requirements based on the risk level of AI systems. Companies deploying high-risk AI must maintain technical documentation, conduct risk assessments, and ensure transparency around how their models are built and how decisions are made.
Because the EU is the world's largest trading bloc, the law is expected to have a significant impact on any company wanting to do business there, he opined. This could push other regions toward similar regulation, though he added that in the US, meaningful legislative movement remains unlikely under the current administration.
The Socket Research team investigates a malicious Python package disguised as a Discord error logger that executes remote commands and exfiltrates data via a covert C2 channel.
On March 21, 2022, a Python package ‘discordpydebug’ was uploaded to the Python Package Index (PyPI) under the name "Discord py error logger." At first glance, it appeared to be a simple utility aimed at developers working on Discord bots using the Discord.py library. However, the package concealed a fully functional remote access trojan (RAT). Over time, the package reached over 11,000 downloads, placing thousands of developer systems at risk.
The package targeted developers who build or maintain Discord bots, typically indie developers, automation engineers, or small teams who might install such tools without extensive scrutiny. Since PyPI doesn’t enforce deep security audits of uploaded packages, attackers often take advantage of this by using misleading descriptions, legitimate-sounding names, or even copying code from popular projects to appear trustworthy. In this case, the goal was to lure unsuspecting developers into installing a backdoor disguised as a debugging aid.
Discord’s developer ecosystem is both massive and tightly knit. With over 200 million monthly active users, more than 25% of whom interact with third-party apps, Discord has rapidly evolved into a platform where developers not only build but also live test, share, and iterate on new ideas directly with their users. Public and private servers dedicated to development topics foster an informal, highly social culture where tips, tools, and code snippets are shared freely and often used with little scrutiny. It’s within these trusted peer-to-peer spaces that threat actors can exploit social engineering tactics, positioning themselves as helpful community members and promoting tools like discordpydebug under the guise of debugging utilities.
The fact that this package was downloaded over 11,000 times, despite having no README or documentation, highlights how quickly trust can be weaponized in these environments. Whether spread via casual recommendation, targeted DMs, or Discord server threads, such packages can gain traction before ever being formally vetted.
Depuis la fin de l’année 2023, VIGINUM observe et documente les activités d’un mode opératoire informationnel russe susceptible d’affecter le débat public numérique francophone et européen, connu sous le nom de « Storm-1516 ».
Le mode opératoire informationnel (MOI) Storm-1516, actif depuis plus d’un an et demi, est responsable de plusieurs dizaines d’opérations informationnelles ayant ciblé des audiences occidentales, dont française. S’appuyant sur l’analyse de 77 opérations informationnelles documentées par VIGINUM et conduites par Storm-1516 entre la date de son apparition supposée et le 5 mars 2025, ce rapport détaille les principaux narratifs et contenus employés, leur chaîne de diffusion, ainsi que les acteurs étrangers impliqués dans la conduite du MOI.
L’analyse par VIGINUM de ces différentes opérations informationnelles démontre que le dispositif d’influence informationnelle russe a investi des efforts conséquents pour coordonner les actions d’un important réseau d’acteurs, d’organisations et de MOI agissant depuis le territoire russe et dans les pays ciblés, et ce depuis le début de l’invasion à grande échelle de l’Ukraine par la Russie en 2022.
Storm-1516 constitue aujourd’hui un mode opératoire informationnel mature, qui offre à ses commanditaires la capacité de mener à la fois des actions de court terme en réaction à l’actualité, mais également de s’inscrire dans des stratégies de long terme, visant à décrédibiliser des personnalités ou des organisations européennes et nord-américaines, notamment en amont de grands événements et de processus électoraux.
Si l’impact réel sur le débat public numérique demeure difficile à estimer, VIGINUM observe que de nombreux narratifs propagés via ce MOI ont atteint une visibilité très importante en ligne, et qu’ils sont parfois repris, de manière inconsciente ou opportuniste, par des personnalités et des représentants politiques de premier plan.
Les opérateurs de Storm-1516 poursuivent aujourd’hui leurs activités avec un rythme opérationnel soutenu, et devraient très probablement continuer à adapter leurs TTPs, notamment pour crédibiliser davantage leurs contenus, tenter de contourner les mécanismes de modération des plateformes, gêner le suivi et l’imputation technique de leurs activités, ou encore renouveler leurs infrastructures d’attaque.
Au regard de ces éléments, VIGINUM considère que les activités de Storm-1516 réunissent les critères d’une ingérence numérique étrangère, et représentent une menace importante pour le débat public numérique français et européen.
